Betty versus Veronica

A thousand pictures

Monday, January 30, 2006

Karen and craft: My first real post

TC0121e02.jpg
On the tour from Hangzhou to Shanghai in China, we visited this town that was built around canals. I forget the actual name of the place [I should write these things down]. There was all this crappy talk from the tour guide about Venice and similar bullshit. I dismissed such simplistic comparisons.

All the houses were tiny timber-framed things with tile roofs, built god-knows when, and looking like it, too. Despite the place being a tourist attraction with an entrance fee, people actually lived there, thus making it 'more authentic'. The people there made a living catering for the needs of the bus loads of tourists that pour through the little village. They would usually be selling Chinese-y souvenirs or recreating a craft from the 'olden days'. So one store had someone manually using a loom, and another place printing onto the fabric made [forget industry!]. They hung up the fabric to dry, or something [I didn't catch the actual process].

That's my sister, there, with her black clothes and brand new all-white All Stars.

This was my favourite destination of the tours we were on. I didn't care for the tourist-oriented throwbacks to the past, but I loved the dilapidated housing. The general vibe of the place, beyond the tourist queso, felt 'real'.

I know, I know, if I went to an actual town like that that wasn't a tourist attraction, it would actually be 'real', but I'd be less one camera, and I'd be unhappy and hate the place. Sometimes you have to be a walking contradiction. In which case, I love tours!

4 Comments:

At 06 February, 2006 15:51, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why, hello.

It's been a long time.

Great photos Martin, and I do care about the specs because I find them important to the picture. God I can be such a geek - I suppose we all are, in our own ways.

I hate tours. Because they remind me of long, sleepless nights on a coach travelling somewhere through Japan. Romantic as that sounds, it was quite horrible. I made no new friends - fortunate, because they might be dead already. I was 8 at the time, and everyone else was 80.

 

At 06 February, 2006 23:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nikon F4; 35mm f/2; Fuji Sensia 100 pushed to 400

There are a few photos with flash when I was around there, but I can't tell if I used it here.

I can't sense any romance in what you described. You mention tours. Ugly. You mention being on a coach at night. Ugly. [We can attest]. You mention no friends. Ugly.

I'm sorry, I'm boring.

 

At 08 February, 2006 09:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You mean the trip to San Sebastian from Madrid wasn't romantic for you? My heart. I've been broken.

 

At 08 February, 2006 23:27, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I fell in love three times on that trip to San Sebastian. I fell in love with the people of Spain, while giving death stares to the kids who wouldn't shut up. I fell in love with you, as I glanced at you thinking you were asleep, between my own failed attempts to sleep. I fell in love with the idea of travel, as the driver came up to us to say, this is your stop, get off the bus now, uh, in English, or Catalan, or Castilian, no, it was sign language, I think.

You know what, that is romance.

 

Post a Comment

Saturday, January 28, 2006

I'm reading a book and it gets to be so preposterous that I'm about to give up on it, before it twists me back in

TC0324e01.jpg
Nikon F4; 20mm f/2.8; Fuji Sensia 100 pushed to 400

You know, I don't think anybody really cares what camera you used.

Fine, I won't do it anymore.

6 Comments:

At 29 January, 2006 04:03, Blogger Lin said...

Ahhh martin martin. I simply love the 2 pics. i reckon u're the best person-who-takes-photos-who-is-of-our-generation-and-status that i know of.
Spanks for the advice reg. the blog design. It's such a pain in the arse, these blog things... just when u think u get it right, something else big crops up and it's hard not to get frustrated.
i'll be making the adjustments when i've got the time, which is not now.
Hey! I'm coming back next week. looking fwd to lending u my new poker book!!

 

At 29 January, 2006 14:19, Blogger schteve said...

Simply sublime.
Tell me, do you crop?

 

At 30 January, 2006 23:25, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanking you both for your compliments.

I didn't crop. This one didn't really need it. Okay, maybe it does, but not desperately.

 

At 31 January, 2006 02:46, Blogger schteve said...

and here comes your dreaded question: Where is it?
(or did you forget to write it down again?)

 

At 31 January, 2006 02:47, Blogger schteve said...

Oh, and I asked "Do you crop?" so it was rather a general question. But you answered half of it already.

 

At 31 January, 2006 21:04, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's often a title for the image if you let your mouse cursor hover over the image for a few moments. I didn't want to say more than that for the first two images.

I thought that was quite general a question when I read it, so I answered it as specifically as I could. But, yes, you have to crop, half of the time.

Alright, to get into specificity, Sun Moon Lake is somewhere in the centre of Taiwan [Formosa]. It was quite picturesque an area, and there was mention of Chiang Kai Shek going there for his holidays. Good company.

 

Post a Comment

Saturday, January 21, 2006

I've grown to enjoy cheese

TC0311e01.jpg
I don't want to bore you with the minutiae of my life [no, wait, that's all that I ever do], so I'll just say that I'm only happy with a handful of the scans that came back of the one hundred and eighty photos I took while away. I still needed to fix this one up.

Weren't you ecstatic with the original slides, though?

Yes, they were sublime - it didn't transfer to the scans, and I'm blaming the place where I got it done.

Nikon F4; 20mm f/2.8; Fuji Sensia 100 pushed to 400; TTL flash

Yes, more contrast. I think that helped the image slightly - it was about half hour after dusk when I was there.

Yes, more grain. What can you do about that? But I guess you can't tell with this size on screen.

I fucked up, though, with the filter on my lens vignetting the corners. Will either get rid of the bloody thing completely, or buy a filter with a thinner ring [more expensive]. Yeah, I could have Photoshopped it right, but that's not really what I'm about.

Yes! Flash! I'd planned to learn flash this time around, and I think I've progressed considerably. Hit and misses throughout, but I think this is a hit with the flash. Death to available light!

Of the subject matter: I have no clue as to why I did it [I'm generally an internationalist]. Deal with it.

8 Comments:

At 22 January, 2006 00:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe I should crop.

 

At 23 January, 2006 14:09, Blogger schteve said...

I've lapsed about two months of shared lives. Tell me, what is, or who is, or what the fuck is, Barbara?

Or am I missing/forgetting something?

 

At 24 January, 2006 00:02, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I chose Barbara because:

One:
BK is Barbara Kruger - check her stuff out.

Two:
I've always had a fascination with the name, and with pop music's fascination with the name... well, okay, the only two that come to mind are by Fountains of Wayne, and the Beach Boys. Sing it: Ba ba ba, ba Barbara Ann... [Seriously, I wrote about this phenomenon a while ago, as a note to remind myself... why Barbara?]

Three:
It's always fun to give titles that make people look twice.

Four:
It might have been a remnant of when I spoke to my blog. Giving it a name so I can refer to it/her without confusing with my schizophrenic 'dialogues'. [ie. I talk to the blog, and I talk to myself. Myself sometimes replies, Barbara remains silent.]

Five:
I've got some ideas/philosophies about names that I won't elucidate now [though it might have been addressed earlier], but which encouraged me to not want to 'name' the blog after me.

Don't worry, you haven't missed a thing.

Meanwhile, how was Japan? Look, I was in Taiwan!

 

At 24 January, 2006 00:05, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Okay, okay, I haven't always had a fascination with that name. I made that up.

 

At 24 January, 2006 05:09, Blogger Lin said...

Hey!
And It's "Ba ba baaa, ba' baabra Ann!" (Shit, it's addictive! I've got that in my head now!!!)
COOL! Never thought that was in the equation. May I add that you could have just quoted to steve a Bobby Vee song titled "Please Don't Ask About Barbara".
And then there's that Streisand chick.... Did she have anything to do with it?

 

At 24 January, 2006 21:08, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wow, thanks Lin. I know nothing of pop music like the likes of you. That would have been too good an answer, if I knew of it. Bobby Vee? He didn't make it into the Rolling Stone 200 [1997], or their 500 Greatest Albums of All Time [2004], so I wouldn't know of him [that magazine being the only source of information about music before 1978 that I have... oh, and the internet].

 

At 29 January, 2006 14:20, Blogger schteve said...

Well, I just can't stop thinking about South Park when I hear "Bar-ba-ra". I guess it's a cool name in that it has so many different associations...

 

At 31 January, 2006 23:49, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I had to google to understand your South Park reference.

You know, back in high school, I dismissed South Park as something for those kids that liked cutesy things, but who might have had a hell bent in them -- it couldn't compare with the Simpsons. I've been watching it again, these past few weeks, and I'm in love with the show! I think it has grown since the stupider early years -- when you're making fun of Katrina and global warming, you've got to be on the right track.

Oh, yes, it was a terrible tragedy, Katrina. And global warming is a dire issue... whatever.

Hi Steve. Sorry about my digression.

 

Post a Comment

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Wedding day forecast: rain

Barbara,

I was thinking about what was said, with friend Tamara, about anarchy, and the social ritual of weekends, and I thought, why not fuck things up this weekend. Inject a little of that anarchy.

I was well on the road, in my mind, before I stepped back and saw all the calculated moves I'd made.

I find myself driving to nowhere in particular. But there I am, doing it for the sake of doing it. I'm not there because it's the least likely thing for me to do, but because it's the most likely thing to do when you're in this mindstate of anarchy.

I think, what else can I do? Everything leads you to an ironic ending of conformity.

We are not individuals. It's all been done.

Anarchy doesn't exist.

1 Comments:

At 17 January, 2006 21:57, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dissection:

Title: Ironic - Alanis Morissette.

Tamara, was it really about wanting anarchy, or thinking that going out is getting old in its mundanity, or about coming up with new stuff to do? Something else, completely?

On the Road - Jack Kerouac

My going on the road was a good knee-jerk, I think. I think it would be hard to experience disorder at home, where one is too comfortable.

I also took the cue from Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, in going somewhere for the weekend. But, you see, there is the calculation, the order in the apparent disorder.

I didn't try too hard to come up with something else. I'd already made up my mind: Anarchy doesn't exist. Just do what you want to do.

"Yes, we are all individuals." - Monty Python

[I thought I needed to clean up my late-night rambling.]

 

Post a Comment

Sunday, January 08, 2006

Currently listening to: Destroyer

I love that moment in the Simpsons, when Bart takes Milhouse and Nelson to an R-rated film using a fake ID. The three walk out of the cinema, with 'Naked Lunch' in lights above them, and Nelson goes, out loud, in his usual gruff voice, "I can think of at least two things wrong with that title."

So, on the plane in, I saw the new Cronenberg film, 'A History of Violence'.

It was great. I love ultra-violence [However, I abhor rape and am undecided on Beethoven]. You know the world is generally a good place when you can see the dramatisation on screen of a man gagging on his blood even after having been shot in the head.

I like the title, because I read it as a title, and, like Nelson, I was confused. Later, I understand the title as being a phrase, and not an indicator of content.

Why did I expect a history of violence in the film?

Check it out, when it is released. Maybe I'll come with.

3 Comments:

At 18 February, 2006 18:00, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't have the insight, nor the knowledge of the director to have written this review, but I believe my 174 word effort above touches upon some of the same themes [if only ever so slightly]. It was fun to read this and compare with my own ideas.

I, however, dislike the last third of the piece [thankfully, smh.com.au broke up this article into three pages, so you can read the first two parts and ignore the last. If you're reading the article in the paper, stop reading when David Lynch is mentioned]. The first two-thirds is interesting in that it leads to the analysis of the film through a history of Cronenberg’s other films with respect to the nature of being alive [paraphrased from the newspaper subtitle]. The last third is a bland retelling of the story. And the conclusion offers nothing inspiring.

And that was my review of a review [well, it was a feature article about a film, but what is a review, anyway?].

 

At 03 March, 2006 13:22, Blogger schteve said...

I shall not read anymore about this film until I see it. Hm.

 

At 04 March, 2006 21:11, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know, you're right, Steve.

I've seen this film. As I was trawling through all the written material concerning the film, after having seen it, I had the ability to relate back to what I saw and think about it.

That's a difficulty I find when I read some reviews. Some reviewers will be too easily tempted to talk about what they've seen/heard/read/experienced without really describing it for those of us who have not seen/heard/read/experienced it. Granted, spoilers are never fun.

Nevertheless, I will readily give up on an article when, just past halfway through the piece, the author lists adjectives followed by italicised titles, or lyric snippets illustrating the adjectives. SMH CD reviewers are notorious for this crime of laziness [eg. Bernard Zuel's Augie March review in today's paper].

In fact [I'd just now read the review, albeit very quickly], the problem with the titles and lyrics is that I can't relate. I can't relate to lyrics [as has been previously addressed in another post], and a simple title doesn't tell me that that song is as described by the descriptive words. You really need to listen to the album to appreciate what is being written, which kinda defeats the purpose of writing/reading the article [since you're reading it, usually, to tell you whether you should buy the album or not].

My goal: A review as an entity within itself. Yes, it is referential, but one shouldn't be required to be well versed in the subject to appreciate the review.

Short version: Yes, I agree with you, Steve.

 

Post a Comment

Sunday, January 01, 2006

Hangzhou Continental Hotel

I read in Time magazine a while back an article about how China was slowly weaning itself onto this new-fangled thing called the 'internet'. Of course, there would be limitations [I hope you understand what I'm saying, and realise that I'm scared... I'm scared of being woken up tonight by the sound of the secret police crashing my door down and dragging me out of bed to take me to the Ministry of Love, or something along those lines, if I am any more specific in saying what I'm thinking... you know? Comment if you don't understand, and I possibly can reply an explanation in more peaceful circumstances...], so I find I can't load this website, advarp, or Barbara, or whatever you or I want to call it. I find I can't load anybody else's blog, either. However, I am able to log into the account, albeit in what appears to be the Spanish version of the site, to post these thoughts. And, hopefully, they will make it out of this country.

Tonight, I'm staying in room 706 of the above hotel. Can I say that I haven't ever experienced such luxury. Will be leaving for God knows where tomorrow, so you'll have to wait until I have a semi-permanent residence in Hong Kong in a couple of days before you can contact me. I hate tours.

I'm going to see if my 200 yuan will stretch to a Martini [or a glass of Moet] in the hotel bar before midnight. My sister, the bore, is asleep already. Look at me, drinking alone [Does God count as a person?].

It's cold here.

Oh, look, it's 2006 in Sydney. Happy.

Do you understand? I'm bored. I'm getting sick of my parents, my sister. Stuff isn't happening; I'm tired. And I'm just thinking of all the fun I'm missing out on, at this moment, in Sydney.

No, it isn't that bad. In fact, it's pretty good. I'm not in Sydney! I'm in China!

For a split second, I considered taking advantage of the hotel pool, but remembered I didn't pack my swimmers for this leg of the trip, due to the fact that it would be, and is, very cold outside.

2 Comments:

At 08 January, 2006 11:40, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Don't worry, at least you aren't in Room 101. Now that, would be a little bit scary.

Or should I say "weren't"? It's the eighth day of January and suddenly I seem to have forgotten how to spell "eighth". It looks right, on screen...

So you must be back! Welcome home, soldier. I have Leica photos to show you. Will post them up on Flickr - some are a bit blah, but I'm telling myself these are practice rolls....

 

At 08 January, 2006 22:27, Anonymous Anonymous said...

CLA, note that I managed to make it home without resorting to telling any older [or, in fact, larger] siblings that I love them.

So, could you afford that martini?

And, a beer, plus tip [I keep forgetting that it is most customary to give them more money than is 'required', hiding behind the 'poor student' rank for too long]. Too bad they don't know what a martini is on the mainland. Maybe it wasn't worth the tip, after it all.

What other mischief did you get up to?

I went to a bunch of places. I felt rather at home in Hong Kong. We stayed in the dingiest hotel on Nathan Road of the peninsula, facing an enormous portrait of Jackie Chan.

Bought a bunch of stuff. I dunno, I did stuff, it was fun to be in other countries. I keep forgetting that I look Chinese, and get annoyed when someone comes up to me and talks to me in this gibberish language.

I took photos. Hope to share them with you soon. They're slides, so if i can get my hands on an actual projector, I might have a slideshow [work has one...]. Fuck it, just upload them.

It was weird, but everything I did reminded me of something in Seinfeld.

Good to be home.

 

Post a Comment